Monday, September 6, 2010

Are leaders born, made... or simply promoted?


I think we can all agree that North America is entrenched in leadership and management techniques, tests, and lingo.
Personally, with a mom working in IBM in "Leadership Development", a background in Education and Social Sciences, experience working with EWB and other volunteer organizations in Canada, and job experiences in Management in Canada, I deeply appreciate the need for a person to develop in their leadership/management capabilities.

Though I recognize that some people are "natural leaders", I believe that all people can and should focus on personal development, grow in their self awareness, and their ability to work effectively with people... especially if they are in management positions.

With HBR articles, countless books, and personality tests readily available, it seems like there are abundant ways to develop as a leader in Canada. But after some time in Ghana, I have recognized that these resources are not as readily available or promoted, and that there isn't as much of a conscious effort to DEVELOP people into managers.
For example, in the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, I was discussing with one of the Principals of the Colleges the challenge of management in MoFA.. how the manager plays a central role in setting the organizational climate, in motivating staff and encouraging high performance. I asked him what happens when someone becomes a District Director of Agriculture (Manager of a MoFA District office), he said... "not much".
In MoFA, promotions tend to be based more on seniority than any other factor, which results in technical experts becoming managers. It's great for a staff to excel in their technical knowledge- in crops, livestock, etc...and by all means, over time they deserve a raise and opportunities to grow in their career. However, I am unsure that merely promoting a technical officer to become a Director is the recipe for district success. Becoming a great manager is more than just getting a new title.

It's not so unlike Chieftancy, where much (if not all) learning takes place "on the job". I remember entering my Chief's room one day to hear him breathe deeply and remark: "Njallawuni, it's not easy being a leader!". He went on to explain some of the conflicts and challenges community members were bringing for him to solve. He certainly didn't pass through University, a 6 week course, or any formal educational structure to learn how to manage such situations effectively.

Many people quickly point to Leadership as the key solution to Africa's problem. I don't think it's as simple as that but don't entirely disagree... I do feel that developing people into leaders and managers will result in stronger leaders, and I acknowledge the important role of leaders in creating social change.. we need leaders who can catalyze change within their spheres of influence. Because at the end of the day, it is determined, intelligent, inspired, committed Ghanaians who will transform Ghana.

3 comments:

  1. Loving the new posts!
    At least one person is reading. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Super interesting post. Your anecdote on the technical expertise being aligned with seniority is particularly thought provoking.

    Do you think it makes more sense (in MOFA) for leadership development to be focused on individuals who have achieved that seniority already, or for individuals (no matter what their seniority) who show the most promise?

    Is a transition from seniority driven leadership to meritocracy driven leadership possible?

    Either way, I think the challenge is certainly not unique to MOFA or Ghana; and your incites are valuable broadly across any organizational experience. Keep up the awesome posting!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Robin! How is it?

    I think you raise great points, and I completely agree leadership is one of the key issues facing Ghana (at least in the public sector).

    The tiered promotion system that the government has results in leaders that look upwards to their seniors, rather than downwards to their staff for success. This creates a culture where it's very difficult for officers to voice concerns, push forward ideas, or even receive adequate support.

    In addition to this, the system as it is now completely dis-incentivizes personal development and learning, simply because it's not valued. It's a catch-22. I noticed that though resources are available in Canada to build leadership skills, they are there because a demand for it exists, and the demand is their partly because the industry values and rewards able employees.

    Where should the system be supported to create this change most effectively? Is it more effective to promote & "put on pedestals" strong leaders that are already there? Or is it more effective to promote social leadership & attitudes through the educational system? Or should we be focusing on trying to improve the managers that are currently there?

    Lotsa love from Canada!
    Amir

    ReplyDelete